According to reports EconomyOnline Quoted from the world of economics; From mid-December until the end of trading on Monday, Payam-e-Nazer announced the suspension of 17 trading symbols due to the possibility of price manipulation. Without going into the details of the mechanism for detecting and detecting price manipulation in symbols, market participants can hear it. In a report yesterday, he cited the reasons for shareholders’ distrust of large market groups that are most exposed to government interference. This issue led traders to the stock with the least government influence. This situation caused this distrust to include non-governmental groups this time as well. Meanwhile, the pursuit of policy-makers, although did not lead to a convincing answer, but it is said that there is no specific mechanism to stop the symbols with the suspicion of price manipulation and full-time monitoring is done in the market so that there is no escape for any suspicious cases. The uncertainty of this mechanism, however, has once again created a flaw in the tastes of companies in this market. An issue that will ultimately lead to nothing but growing distrust of the capital market. However, stock market activists have long been accustomed to these passive behaviors. Behaviors that at any given moment somehow try to disrupt the order and mechanism of the market.
It is easier to manipulate the smaller ones
Mohammad Nourbakhsh, stock market expert: Manipulating the price of small shares can be much easier than large shares and is more operational; Especially since large stocks are faced with strong offers from major market participants or shareholders, and the ambiguity that exists in large stocks has the effect of affecting small stocks as well. So price manipulation in small shares can be much easier, but whether or not this is happening in the market now needs to be examined, and it is not easy to say that in my view the price has been manipulated. But in general, it can be said that small shares are easier to manipulate than large shares.
Large shares can be manipulated by large legal entities. For example, the 300,000 billion Mobarakeh steel can not be easily moved up and down, but the share that has a market value of 5,000 billion and 10% buoyancy can be easily manipulated. Manipulation of small share prices is not necessarily done by legal entities, and it may be done by large realities themselves. They can easily disrupt the normal flow of prices with the brawl they can have.
Price manipulation has always existed
Mojtaba Shahbazi, stock market expert: The subject of manipulation stock price Companies in Capital Market It must be examined from two perspectives. First of all, it should be noted that anything that is magnified in the capital market is not so big and sharp. We are not saying that there is no price manipulation at all, but you should rest assured that this is not as serious as it is being talked about these days. Because the nature of the market is to make some news too hot and big. This did not happen for the issue of price manipulation, and during this time we had many similar cases. These magnifications are the essence of the market.
With this in mind, it remains to be seen what percentage of market price manipulation exists and how much it affects it. Manipulation has always existed in the market and will continue to do so in the future. Therefore, it is not a new issue and it is not specific to this period. When the index was around two million units, no one raised such issues because everyone was in profit and happy. But as the market plummeted, so did various issues. For example, once they said that the lawyers sold and the market fell; So all the blame is on the legal side. To prove it, they also cited the TSE and said that it came from there that most of the sales were related to some legal entity. If this legal is the appearance of the case and behind every legal entity are the facts. Because the realists cancel their baskets and close them, the real estate has to sell, but who can be seen? Legal! Everyone thinks he is a major shareholder if he is not, although sometimes they have sold. Of course, if we look at that time, we see that everyone was pushing for the bubble to form and the legal entities should offer to quench the thirst of the market; They also offered. It is natural that any rights should be sold on positive days that can support the share on negative days; Now whether in the form of marketing box or marketing codes. The market is full and the market is volatile, but the market is always looking for a reason to blame it. It is the same everywhere in the world. When the legal story is over and the market is a bit stable and rises to the level of 1.4 million units, now the debates are followed in another way that the legalists are manipulating the large shares and the small shares are being manipulated by others! If such a thing does not exist as much as they talk about it. This can not be generalized to the whole market, except for a number of specific monopolies or a number of specific industries in which these issues may have been informal. In other words, we can talk about individual symbols and a series of specific symbols, but there is no such thing in the market as a whole.
The market must go its own way. But in the same way, marketing funds can do the same thing, which is very right and legal, but I do not approve of it being done informally. However, some people are biased in the shadow of price manipulation because such discussions are now buyer. Let us not forget that the market had a high growth and after that it witnessed a sharp decline. The government was also to blame for not having a plan. When the index was rising, it only encouraged people to invest, and when the index was falling, it had no plans, which was all wrong. They saw all the problems through the eyes of the organization! But what does the organization do? The organization is a regulator, neither an investor nor a publisher to make a profit. So with the downturn in the market, it is natural for it to build foam and then grow. These fluctuations are also quite natural. In the meantime, there are a number of arguments for the buyer. On the other hand, in the last two years, the market has been full of new people and in other words, it has increased 6 times, all of which are newcomers and are rumored to be their food. It should be said that there has always been limited manipulation in the market and there will be in the future, but it is wrong to try to enlarge it to this extent and overshadow the whole market. What does manipulation mean when a share of 200 million is traded per day and the buyer buys and the seller sells ?!